LogoAI Finance Tools

Co-Sale Rights

Investor right to sell shares alongside a founder in a secondary transaction on the same terms.

Co-sale rights (also called tag-along rights) allow preferred investors to participate in the sale of founder or major stockholder shares to a third party, selling their own shares on the same terms and at the same price as the selling stockholder. Co-sale rights protect investors from being 'left behind' when founders sell significant stakes—ensuring investors can access the same liquidity opportunity on the same economic terms.

Co-sale rights operate after the right of first refusal process. If ROFR holders do not exercise (or partially exercise), investors with co-sale rights can 'tag along' on the remaining shares in the transaction. For example, if a founder is selling 1,000,000 shares and investors have pro-rata co-sale rights, investors can reduce the number of founder shares sold and substitute their own shares up to their proportionate share of the transaction.

Co-sale provisions specify which stockholders hold co-sale rights (typically preferred investors, sometimes later-round investors only), the calculation of each investor's pro-rata entitlement, the notice and exercise period (typically 30 days), and the treatment of oversubscription (if investors elect to co-sell more than their pro-rata, shares are allocated pro-rata among interested co-sellers).

From the founder's perspective, co-sale rights reduce the number of shares they can sell in any secondary transaction and complicate the logistics of managing multiple sellers. From the investor's perspective, co-sale rights provide essential parity: if a founder has found a buyer willing to pay a premium price, investors deserve the same access.

Co-sale rights typically terminate upon a company IPO (when all shareholders gain equal market access) or a registered change of control.

FAQs

What is the difference between co-sale rights and drag-along rights?

Co-sale (tag-along) rights protect minority investors by allowing them to participate in a sale initiated by a major stockholder—they can choose to join the sale if they wish. Drag-along rights protect majority stockholders (often investors) by compelling minority stockholders (often founders) to sell their shares in an approved transaction even if they prefer not to. Tag-along gives minority holders a voluntary right to participate; drag-along imposes an obligation on minority holders to accept a sale approved by a specified majority. Both provisions appear in the same stockholder agreements but serve opposite functions.

How is co-sale entitlement calculated in practice?

Co-sale entitlement is typically calculated pro-rata based on each investor's percentage ownership of the company on a fully diluted basis. If an investor holds 10% of the company and a founder proposes to sell 500,000 shares, the investor's co-sale entitlement is 10% × 500,000 = 50,000 shares. The founder would then only be able to sell 450,000 shares, with the investor selling 50,000 shares to the same buyer on the same terms. If multiple investors have co-sale rights, each participates pro-rata to their ownership relative to all co-sale rights holders.

Can founders structure transactions to avoid triggering co-sale rights?

Founders can avoid triggering co-sale rights through permitted transfers (gifts to family trusts, transfers to personal holding companies) that are carved out of co-sale and ROFR provisions. However, transfer restrictions typically prohibit any transfer designed to circumvent co-sale obligations, and courts may look through transactions structured specifically to avoid them. In legitimate secondary transactions—tender offers, direct sales to financial buyers—co-sale rights are generally unavoidable and should be negotiated proactively with investors. Companies increasingly facilitate structured secondary programs that acknowledge co-sale rights and manage investor participation systematically.

Related Terms

Tools for this concept

Sirion is an enterprise-grade AI-powered contract lifecycle management platform recognized as a Leader by Forrester in CLM. Founded in 2012 in India with global operations, Sirion serves major enterprises including Deutsche Bank, Vodafone, Airtel, and AstraZeneca with sophisticated CLM capabilities. Sirion's AI platform—SirionAI—provides deep contract analytics including obligation extraction, performance monitoring, risk identification, and compliance tracking across complex contract portfolios. The platform covers the full lifecycle: authoring with guided workflows, negotiation with real-time redlining, execution with eSignature, and post-signature management with obligation monitoring. Sirion's strength in complex, high-value outsourcing and IT services contracts differentiates it in the CLM market. Its obligation management tracks thousands of contractual commitments with automated performance monitoring and escalation. Financial impact analysis quantifies the P&L effect of contract terms and deviations. The platform integrates with SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, and ServiceNow. Sirion's contract intelligence features analyze negotiation patterns and benchmark outcomes against internal and market standards. The company rebranded from SirionLabs to Sirion in 2022 as it expanded its market presence globally. Gartner consistently recognizes Sirion as a Visionary or Leader in CLM. Its enterprise focus, deep AI capabilities, and strong performance management features make it particularly suited for complex B2B relationships in outsourcing, financial services, and telecommunications.

Malbek is a modern contract lifecycle management platform with deep Salesforce integration, designed for mid-market and enterprise companies that want to run contract workflows within their existing Salesforce ecosystem. Founded in 2017, Malbek was built from the ground up to work seamlessly with Salesforce, reducing the data silos that plague separate CLM and CRM systems. The platform provides AI-powered contract creation from templates and Salesforce data, smart redlining with clause alternatives, configurable approval workflows, eSignature integration, and an AI-powered contract repository. Malbek's AI extracts key terms from uploaded contracts and populates structured fields automatically. Obligation tracking monitors post-signature commitments with automated reminders. The platform's Salesforce-native experience means sales reps can initiate, track, and access contracts without leaving Salesforce. Legal teams work in Malbek's dedicated interface, which provides the full CLM functionality they need. Analytics provide pipeline metrics on contract cycle times, negotiation patterns, and renewal risk. Malbek's implementation methodology focuses on rapid deployment—most customers go live in 4–8 weeks. Integration with DocuSign, Adobe Sign, and other eSignature tools provides flexibility. Malbek has been recognized by Gartner and Forrester as a notable CLM vendor for its modern architecture and Salesforce focus. It is popular with technology companies, financial services firms, and B2B SaaS businesses.

Gatekeeper is a vendor and contract lifecycle management platform that uniquely combines supplier relationship management with full contract lifecycle capabilities. Founded in London in 2015, Gatekeeper addresses the reality that contracts and vendor relationships are inseparable—you can't manage contracts effectively without managing the vendors they govern. The platform provides contract creation from templates, multi-stakeholder collaboration and approval workflows, eSignature integration, and a searchable contract repository. The vendor management module maintains supplier profiles, contact information, performance data, compliance documents, and risk assessments alongside related contracts. Gatekeeper's AI Contract Assistant (GAIA) extracts key terms, identifies risk clauses, and answers questions about contract content. Renewal management provides advance notice of upcoming expirations with automated workflows. The Kanban-style contract pipeline gives visual visibility into where each contract is in its lifecycle. Performance management tracks vendor KPIs and contract obligations over time. Integration with procurement systems, ERP platforms, and business applications connects contract data to broader business processes. Gatekeeper is particularly popular with procurement teams that see vendor management and contract management as unified disciplines. Its combination of CLM and vendor management in a single platform reduces tool sprawl. The platform serves mid-market to enterprise customers across technology, retail, financial services, and manufacturing.